
Your friends might not be so private.. they're watching you & anything could end up online.
Its all going off at the moment.. Super-injunctions, celebs secrets coming out on Twitter, Facebook still not happy with Google.. the battles are raging.
All this could be relevant to everyone who uses social networks and the internet.
You can control what you put online, but you have no control over what others say or the photos they post?
Last week it was reported that Facebook had been purposely creating negative stories in the press regarding Google’s Social Search. Some suggested that the service was risking the privacy of Facebook users and their info. Google returned a statement that any data kept private on Facebook remained private and only became public if the original Facebook content is public.
While this might sound ok.. what if an unfavourable photo of you is posted on your friends public profile? It might even end up in Google image search someday!
Facebook encourages web developers to use it’s API to enhance their sites, which often results in further reach and brand awareness for the developers and Facebook themselves. However, it would seem that they are not so happy about major competitors Google allowing their users to access the data to expand their search results. Facebook has a lot of data about it’s users.. info that is very valuable to them, especially when they feel their dominance of the social web could become diluted.
Super Injunctions & Twitter Tweets
Last week also saw the concern over super-injunctions being broken on Twitter. Courts can ban the press from reporting stories throughout the UK, but when the publishing website is based in America (outside the jurisdiction of British courts) and the person who tweets the banned information is unknown.. who is to blame for the breaking of the injuction?
Anyone can say anything on an anonymous profile.. and Twitter says it doesn’t take responsibility for its users content.
It’s usually impossible to catch original whistle-blowers as they can easily use internet cafes and public wi-fi to avoid IP address tracing. Apparently re-tweeting and sharing a story protected by a super-injunction can also be an offence, but if over 200,000 people are sharing a tweet, it’s impractical to try to enforce the ruling.
This has now resulted in courts admitting that super-injunctions are basically useless and that the laws on media privacy need a fresh approach to address the new technology and rapid reach of information.
This whole confusion over privacy doesn’t just apply to rich celebrities either. It’s a clear message that, whoever you are, even when going to great lengths to keep something hidden, perhaps you should be prepared for the day it eventually ends up on the web…
It could be anyone.. don’t be so afraid of the cctv and the state watching you all the time, it might be your friend with a camera phone that gets you into trouble with the boss, your wife or everyone you know!